SEM — Rod-shaped cells colonising an iron(III)-oxide (ferrihydrite) coating on a silicon wafer after 11 days with electron donor. Species-level image (Geobacter sulfurreducens). Adapted from Newsome L et al. (2018), FEMS Microbiol Ecol 94(8):fiy104, Fig. 1B. Source · CC BY 4.0 · Cropped to panel B from the figure embedded in the article PDF; converted to WebP

Electrogen · Bidirectional EET · DIET partner donor

Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA

Thermodesulfobacteriota · Desulfuromonadia · Geobacteraceae

ElectroactiveEET bidirectionalType strainBSL-1Comprehensive record
  • Model organism
  • Anode respiring
  • Metal reducer
  • Tier 1
  • DIET donor
Bidirectional
Electron transfer
electroactive
30°C
Optimal temperature
grows 25–35 °C
6.8
Optimal pH
grows pH 6–7.5
4A/m²
Max current density
range 1–7.6

01 · Identity

Identity

Where this organism sits in the tree of life, how to obtain it, and what a cell looks like.

Lineage

  1. domainBacteria
  2. ›phylumThermodesulfobacteriota
  3. ›classDesulfuromonadia
  4. ›orderGeobacterales
  5. ›familyGeobacteraceae
  6. ›genusGeobacter
  7. ›speciesGeobacter sulfurreducens PCA

Formerly classified as Deltaproteobacteria.

Culture collections & accessions

DSMZ
DSM 12127
ATCC
ATCC 51573
NCBI taxon
243231
Genome
GCF_000007985.2
Status
Type strain

Isolation

From Potomac River sediment, Maryland, USA by Caccavo F. et al. (1994).

Caccavo F, et al. (1994). Geobacter sulfurreducens sp. nov. PubMed

Genome

3.81Mb
Genome size
60.9%
GC content
Complete
Assembly level
1
Contigs

Cell morphology

Rod, Gram-negative (diderm)

length 2.5 (1.5–4) µm · width 0.5 (0.4–0.7) µm

  • Motile: no
  • Pili: yes
  • Capsule: no
  • S-layer: no
  • Outer-membrane vesicles: no
  • Spore-forming: no

02 · Electron transfer

Electron transfer

How electrons cross the cell envelope — the property that makes a microbe useful in an electrochemical system.

ElectroactiveEET bidirectional
CELLELECTRODEOUTER-MEMBRANE CYTOCHROMESOmcBOmcCOmcSOmcZe⁻e⁻NANOWIRE · OMCS CYTOCHROME FILAMENTe⁻e⁻DIET → M. harundinaceae⁻e⁻
Electrons flow both ways

Mechanisms

  • Outer-membrane cytochromes: yes
  • Conductive pili / nanowires: yes
  • Endogenous shuttles: no
  • Exogenous shuttles: no

Nanowire conductivity 0.028 (0.001–0.5) S/cm

OmcS filament intrinsic conductivity ~28 mS/cm; values vary widely with measurement method (network vs single-filament). See Wang 2019, Yalcin 2020.

Redox ladder

H⁺/H₂Acetate/CO₂-0.5-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.10.00.10.20.31234
■ cytochrome · ○ shuttleE°′ (V vs SHE)
  1. 1OmcZ -0.22 V · Extracellular · 8 hemes
  2. 2OmcS -0.212 V · Nanowire filament · 6 hemes
  3. 3OmcB -0.19 V · Outer membrane · 12 hemes
  4. 4PpcA -0.15 V · Periplasm · 3 hemes

Cytochromes (14)

NameLocationHemesE°′VStructure
CbcLInner membrane9——

Required for low-potential (≤−0.1 V) electron transfer.

ImcHInner membrane6——

Inner-membrane cytochrome required for high-potential acceptors.

OmaBOuter membrane———

Component of the OmaB-OmbB porin-cytochrome complex.

OmaCOuter membrane———

Component of the OmaC-OmbC porin-cytochrome complex.

OmbBOuter membrane———

β-barrel porin partner of OmaB.

OmbCOuter membrane———

β-barrel porin partner of OmaC.

OmcBOuter membrane12-0.19—

Outer-membrane dodecaheme; required for Fe(III) citrate reduction.

OmcCOuter membrane12——

Paralog of OmcB; less essential phenotypically.

OmcENanowire filament4——

Tetraheme nanowire identified by cryo-EM (Wang 2022).

OmcSNanowire filament6-0.212PDB 6EF8EMDB EMD-9046

Forms the canonical conductive nanowire filament (Wang 2019).

OmcZExtracellular8-0.22PDB 7TFS

Octaheme; high-current-density biofilm filament (Yalcin 2020).

PpcAPeriplasm3-0.15—

Periplasmic triheme; central to Fe(III) and U(VI) reduction.

PpcBPeriplasm3——

PpcA paralog.

PpcDPeriplasm3——

PpcA paralog.

Direct transfer — detail

Completeness
Mapped
Nanowire length
5 (1–20) µm

Mediated transfer — detail

Completeness
Mapped

03 · Growth envelope

Growth envelope

The conditions this organism tolerates and what it eats and breathes — the operating window for a reactor.

MesophileObligate anaerobeChemoorganoheterotroph
Temperature30 (25–35) °C
0100 °C
pH6.8 (6–7.5)
014
Doubling time8 (6–12) h
020 h

Energy metabolism

Electron donors

  • Acetate
  • H2
  • Formate

Electron acceptors

  • Fe(III)
  • Mn(IV)
  • Fumarate
  • Anode
  • S0
  • U(VI)

Carbon sources

  • Acetate
  • Hydrogen
  • Formate
  • Lactate
  • Pyruvate
  • Respiratory: yes
  • Fermentative: no

Metabolism — detail

ATP synthase type
Proton dependent
Energy conservation mechanism
Oxidative phosphorylation
Lag phase
1 h

04 · Growth & electron-transfer kinetics

Growth & electron-transfer kinetics

How fast this organism grows and how hard it pushes electrons into an anode, as the corpus reports it, and what those constants imply when you run them.

Kinetic evidence

ParameterMedian10–90 %nSource
Max. specific growth rate μmax0.084 h⁻¹0.04–0.186genus prior · 3 refs
Half-saturation constant Ks80 mg/L20–2004genus prior · 3 refs
Biomass yield Y0.07 g/g0.04–0.14genus prior · 3 refs
Decay coefficient kdNot in the corpus yet
Exchange current density i₀Not in the corpus yet
Transfer coefficient αNot in the corpus yet
Tafel slopeNot in the corpus yet

Median of the extracted values, the 10–90 % spread behind it and how many values it pools.

43 rows were not pooled: their unit could not be converted unambiguously.

Evidence rows (55)

Listed, not pooled (55)

  1. lag_phase1 hourNot verifiedspecies rowconfidence 0.95

    Cation-driven envelope dynamics modulate outer membrane vesiculation and extracellular electron transfer in Geobacter · 2026 · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8864095/v1

    “The DB-grown cells reproducibly underwent slightly longer (> 1 hour) lag phases yet, once acclimated, they doubled faster than in the NB medium.”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "lag_phase"

  2. I_max29.5 A/m²Not verifiedspecies rowconfidence 0.95

    A microfluidic study of acetate conversion kinetics in a microbial electrolysis cell: The role of age, concentration and flow on biofilm permeability · 2024 · 10.1016/j.snb.2024.135779

    “current densities up to 29.5 A/m² recorded across multiple flow conditions || canonical_organism: geobacter_sulfurreducens_pca || canonical_substrate: acetate”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "I_max"

  3. I_max29.5 A/m²Not verifiedspecies rowconfidence 0.95

    A microfluidic study of acetate conversion kinetics in a microbial electrolysis cell: The role of age, concentration and flow on biofilm permeability · 2024 · 10.1016/j.snb.2024.135779

    “current densities up to 29.5 A/m² recorded across multiple flow conditions || canonical_organism: geobacter_sulfurreducens_pca || canonical_substrate: acetate”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "I_max"

  4. mu_max0.12 mA/hNot verifiedspecies rowconfidence 0.8

    Electron Donors Supporting Growth and Electroactivity of Geobacter sulfurreducens Anode Biofilms · 2012 · 10.1128/aem.06782-11

    “The rate of current increase, which correlates with the exponential phase of biofilm growth (22), averaged 0.12 mA h⁻¹ in triplicate BESs”

    Not used in an estimate · unit "mA/h" is not an unambiguous muMaxPerH unit

  5. mu_max0.12 mA/hNot verifiedspecies rowconfidence 0.8

    Electron Donors Supporting Growth and Electroactivity of Geobacter sulfurreducens Anode Biofilms · 2012 · 10.1128/aem.06782-11

    “The rate of current increase, which correlates with the exponential phase of biofilm growth (22), averaged 0.12 mA h⁻¹ in triplicate BESs”

    Not used in an estimate · unit "mA/h" is not an unambiguous muMaxPerH unit

  6. mu_max0.12 mA/hNot verifiedspecies rowconfidence 0.8

    Electron Donors Supporting Growth and Electroactivity of Geobacter sulfurreducens Anode Biofilms · 2012 · 10.1128/aem.06782-11

    “The rate of current increase, which correlates with the exponential phase of biofilm growth (22), averaged 0.12 mA h⁻¹ in triplicate BESs”

    Not used in an estimate · unit "mA/h" is not an unambiguous muMaxPerH unit

  7. mu_max0.12 mA/hNot verifiedspecies rowconfidence 0.8

    Electron Donors Supporting Growth and Electroactivity of Geobacter sulfurreducens Anode Biofilms · 2012 · 10.1128/aem.06782-11

    “The rate of current increase, which correlates with the exponential phase of biofilm growth (22), averaged 0.12 mA h⁻¹ in triplicate BESs”

    Not used in an estimate · unit "mA/h" is not an unambiguous muMaxPerH unit

  8. K_M0.35 mMNot verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.93

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM = 0.28-0.42 mM (2nd cycle) || range: [0.28, 0.42] || canonical_organism: geobacter_sulfurreducens_pca || canonical_substrate: acetate”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  9. K_M0.35 mMNot verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.93

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM = 0.28-0.42 mM (2nd cycle) || range: [0.28, 0.42] || canonical_organism: geobacter_sulfurreducens_pca || canonical_substrate: acetate”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  10. vmax0.0034 mmol/h/cm²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.92

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax = 0.0031-0.0037 mmol h⁻¹ cm⁻² (2nd cycle) || range: [0.0031, 0.0037] || canonical_organism: geobacter_sulfurreducens_pca || canonical_substrate: acetate”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  11. vmax0.0034 mmol/h/cm²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.92

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax = 0.0031-0.0037 mmol h⁻¹ cm⁻² (2nd cycle) || range: [0.0031, 0.0037] || canonical_organism: geobacter_sulfurreducens_pca || canonical_substrate: acetate”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  12. vmax0.0042 mmol Ac⁻ h⁻¹ cm⁻²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax,Ac and KM,Ac, decreased from 0.0042–0.0051 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2 to 0.0031–0.0037 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  13. vmax0.0051 mmol Ac⁻ h⁻¹ cm⁻²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax,Ac and KM,Ac, decreased from 0.0042–0.0051 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2 to 0.0031–0.0037 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  14. vmax0.0031 mmol Ac⁻ h⁻¹ cm⁻²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax,Ac and KM,Ac, decreased from 0.0042–0.0051 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2 to 0.0031–0.0037 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  15. vmax0.0037 mmol Ac⁻ h⁻¹ cm⁻²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax,Ac and KM,Ac, decreased from 0.0042–0.0051 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2 to 0.0031–0.0037 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  16. K_M1.02 mM Ac⁻Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM,Ac, decreased from 1.02–2.61 mM Ac− to 0.28–0.42 mM Ac−”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  17. K_M2.61 mM Ac⁻Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM,Ac, decreased from 1.02–2.61 mM Ac− to 0.28–0.42 mM Ac−”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  18. K_M0.28 mM Ac⁻Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM,Ac, decreased from 1.02–2.61 mM Ac− to 0.28–0.42 mM Ac−”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  19. K_M0.42 mM Ac⁻Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM,Ac, decreased from 1.02–2.61 mM Ac− to 0.28–0.42 mM Ac−”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  20. vmax0.0042 mmol Ac⁻ h⁻¹ cm⁻²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax,Ac and KM,Ac, decreased from 0.0042–0.0051 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2 to 0.0031–0.0037 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  21. vmax0.0051 mmol Ac⁻ h⁻¹ cm⁻²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax,Ac and KM,Ac, decreased from 0.0042–0.0051 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2 to 0.0031–0.0037 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  22. vmax0.0031 mmol Ac⁻ h⁻¹ cm⁻²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax,Ac and KM,Ac, decreased from 0.0042–0.0051 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2 to 0.0031–0.0037 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  23. vmax0.0037 mmol Ac⁻ h⁻¹ cm⁻²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax,Ac and KM,Ac, decreased from 0.0042–0.0051 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2 to 0.0031–0.0037 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  24. K_M1.02 mM Ac⁻Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM,Ac, decreased from 1.02–2.61 mM Ac− to 0.28–0.42 mM Ac−”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  25. K_M2.61 mM Ac⁻Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM,Ac, decreased from 1.02–2.61 mM Ac− to 0.28–0.42 mM Ac−”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  26. K_M0.28 mM Ac⁻Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM,Ac, decreased from 1.02–2.61 mM Ac− to 0.28–0.42 mM Ac−”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  27. K_M0.42 mM Ac⁻Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM,Ac, decreased from 1.02–2.61 mM Ac− to 0.28–0.42 mM Ac−”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  28. vmax0.0042 mmol Ac⁻ h⁻¹ cm⁻²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax,Ac and KM,Ac, decreased from 0.0042–0.0051 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2 to 0.0031–0.0037 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  29. vmax0.0051 mmol Ac⁻ h⁻¹ cm⁻²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax,Ac and KM,Ac, decreased from 0.0042–0.0051 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2 to 0.0031–0.0037 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  30. vmax0.0031 mmol Ac⁻ h⁻¹ cm⁻²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax,Ac and KM,Ac, decreased from 0.0042–0.0051 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2 to 0.0031–0.0037 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  31. vmax0.0037 mmol Ac⁻ h⁻¹ cm⁻²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax,Ac and KM,Ac, decreased from 0.0042–0.0051 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2 to 0.0031–0.0037 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  32. K_M1.02 mM Ac⁻Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM,Ac, decreased from 1.02–2.61 mM Ac− to 0.28–0.42 mM Ac−”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  33. K_M2.61 mM Ac⁻Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM,Ac, decreased from 1.02–2.61 mM Ac− to 0.28–0.42 mM Ac−”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  34. K_M0.28 mM Ac⁻Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM,Ac, decreased from 1.02–2.61 mM Ac− to 0.28–0.42 mM Ac−”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  35. K_M0.42 mM Ac⁻Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM,Ac, decreased from 1.02–2.61 mM Ac− to 0.28–0.42 mM Ac−”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  36. vmax0.0042 mmol Ac⁻ h⁻¹ cm⁻²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax,Ac and KM,Ac, decreased from 0.0042–0.0051 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2 to 0.0031–0.0037 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  37. vmax0.0051 mmol Ac⁻ h⁻¹ cm⁻²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax,Ac and KM,Ac, decreased from 0.0042–0.0051 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2 to 0.0031–0.0037 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  38. vmax0.0031 mmol Ac⁻ h⁻¹ cm⁻²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax,Ac and KM,Ac, decreased from 0.0042–0.0051 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2 to 0.0031–0.0037 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  39. vmax0.0037 mmol Ac⁻ h⁻¹ cm⁻²Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “vmax,Ac and KM,Ac, decreased from 0.0042–0.0051 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2 to 0.0031–0.0037 mmol Ac−h−1 cm−2”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "vmax"

  40. K_M1.02 mM Ac⁻Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM,Ac, decreased from 1.02–2.61 mM Ac− to 0.28–0.42 mM Ac−”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  41. K_M2.61 mM Ac⁻Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM,Ac, decreased from 1.02–2.61 mM Ac− to 0.28–0.42 mM Ac−”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  42. K_M0.28 mM Ac⁻Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM,Ac, decreased from 1.02–2.61 mM Ac− to 0.28–0.42 mM Ac−”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  43. K_M0.42 mM Ac⁻Not verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.9

    Determining incremental coulombic efficiency and physiological parameters of early stage Geobacter spp. enrichment biofilms · 2020 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0234077

    “KM,Ac, decreased from 1.02–2.61 mM Ac− to 0.28–0.42 mM Ac−”

    Not used in an estimate · Michaelis-Menten Km, not Monod Ks

  44. E_eq-0.4 V_vs_Ag_AgCl_3M_KClNot verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.92

    Behavior of two-chamber microbial electrochemical systems started-up with different ion-exchange membrane separators · 2019 · 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.097

    “In the consecutive acetate feedings, EA got more negative and comparable for each MFCs (-0.4 ± 0.03 V)”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "E_eq"

  45. E_eq0.4 V_vs_Ag_AgCl_3M_KClNot verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.92

    Behavior of two-chamber microbial electrochemical systems started-up with different ion-exchange membrane separators · 2019 · 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.097

    “EC for AEM-MFC was stabilized at +0.40 ± 0.04 V after the 18th day”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "E_eq"

  46. E_eq0.33 V_vs_Ag_AgCl_3M_KClNot verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.92

    Behavior of two-chamber microbial electrochemical systems started-up with different ion-exchange membrane separators · 2019 · 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.097

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "E_eq"

  47. E_eq0.27 V_vs_Ag_AgCl_3M_KClNot verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.92

    Behavior of two-chamber microbial electrochemical systems started-up with different ion-exchange membrane separators · 2019 · 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.097

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "E_eq"

  48. E_eq-0.4 V_vs_Ag_AgCl_3M_KClNot verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.92

    Behavior of two-chamber microbial electrochemical systems started-up with different ion-exchange membrane separators · 2019 · 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.097

    “In the consecutive acetate feedings, EA got more negative and comparable for each MFCs (-0.4 ± 0.03 V)”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "E_eq"

  49. E_eq0.4 V_vs_Ag_AgCl_3M_KClNot verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.92

    Behavior of two-chamber microbial electrochemical systems started-up with different ion-exchange membrane separators · 2019 · 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.097

    “EC for AEM-MFC was stabilized at +0.40 ± 0.04 V after the 18th day”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "E_eq"

  50. E_eq0.33 V_vs_Ag_AgCl_3M_KClNot verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.92

    Behavior of two-chamber microbial electrochemical systems started-up with different ion-exchange membrane separators · 2019 · 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.097

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "E_eq"

  51. E_eq0.27 V_vs_Ag_AgCl_3M_KClNot verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.92

    Behavior of two-chamber microbial electrochemical systems started-up with different ion-exchange membrane separators · 2019 · 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.097

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "E_eq"

  52. E_eq-0.4 V_vs_Ag_AgCl_3M_KClNot verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.92

    Behavior of two-chamber microbial electrochemical systems started-up with different ion-exchange membrane separators · 2019 · 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.097

    “In the consecutive acetate feedings, EA got more negative and comparable for each MFCs (-0.4 ± 0.03 V)”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "E_eq"

  53. E_eq0.4 V_vs_Ag_AgCl_3M_KClNot verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.92

    Behavior of two-chamber microbial electrochemical systems started-up with different ion-exchange membrane separators · 2019 · 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.097

    “EC for AEM-MFC was stabilized at +0.40 ± 0.04 V after the 18th day”

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "E_eq"

  54. E_eq0.33 V_vs_Ag_AgCl_3M_KClNot verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.92

    Behavior of two-chamber microbial electrochemical systems started-up with different ion-exchange membrane separators · 2019 · 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.097

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "E_eq"

  55. E_eq0.27 V_vs_Ag_AgCl_3M_KClNot verifiedgenus rowconfidence 0.92

    Behavior of two-chamber microbial electrochemical systems started-up with different ion-exchange membrane separators · 2019 · 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.097

    Not used in an estimate · unrecognised kinetic parameter "E_eq"

Genus-level prior: Geobacter sulfurreducens

A genus-level prior is a summary for the whole genus, not a measurement on this strain.

Constants that drive the simulation

Scenario — values you set, not evidence

Initial substrate1000 mg/L
Anode potential vs SHE0 V
Duration72 h
Initial attached biomass0.1 g/m²
Anode area per liquid volume100 m²/m³
Reactor mode

Growth simulation

Scenario: Initial substrate 1000 mg/L · Initial attached biomass 0.1 g/m² · Anode area per liquid volume 100 m²/m³ · Duration 72 h · Batch. Values you set, not evidence.

0.8g/m²
Peak biomass
27.3h
Time to 90 % substrate removal
Attached biomassg/m²
00.50204060h
Bulk substratemg/L
050010000204060h

No current model

The current needs Max. current density jmax, Half-saturation potential E_KA, which this source does not have.

  • Substrate-saturated growth
  • Slowing
  • Stationary

Monod growth has no lag phase; the bands mark where the net growth rate is near its maximum, falling, near zero or negative.

Simulator notes
  • decayPerH absent: no endogenous decay term, so growth is an upper bound
  • biofilmDensityKgPerM3 absent: thickness not computed (thicknessUm = null)
  • no anodePotentialVvsShe / overpotentialV given: current not computed (currentDensityAPerM2 = null)

Driving force per redox carrier

H⁺/H₂Acetate/CO₂-0.5-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.10.00.10.20.31234
■ cytochrome · ○ shuttleE°′ (V vs SHE)
  1. 1OmcZ -0.22 V · Extracellular · 8 hemes
  2. 2OmcS -0.212 V · Nanowire filament · 6 hemes
  3. 3OmcB -0.19 V · Outer membrane · 12 hemes
  4. 4PpcA -0.15 V · Periplasm · 3 hemes

E_anode − E_m at an anode potential of 0 V vs SHE.

  1. OmcZ+220 mV · downhill
  2. OmcS+212 mV · downhill
  3. OmcB+190 mV · downhill
  4. PpcA+150 mV · downhill

These curves are a Monod and Nernst-Monod idealisation (after Marcus et al. 2007 and Torres et al. 2008), parameterised only by the constants listed above: each one carries its n and its 10–90 % range, and a constant with n = 1 has no spread at all. No diffusion inside the biofilm, no detachment, no coulombic-efficiency split. The scenario values are yours, not evidence.

05 · Performance

Performance

Reported electrochemical output, the role it plays in a reactor, and what it produces.

Strong electrogen
1900mW/m²
Max power density
range 800–3900 · per projected anode area
4A/m²
Max current density
range 1–7.6 · per projected anode area
85%
Coulombic efficiency
range 60–95
Onset potential
-0.17 V vs SHE

Role in a reactor

Anode chamberAnode: primary current producer
Typical relative abundance in biofilm60 (30–95) %
0100 %

Often dominates acetate-fed anode biofilms after enrichment.

Substrate → product (1)

  • acetateyields
    • CO2

    anaerobic, anode as electron acceptor · yield 8 electrons/mol acetate · Complete oxidation to CO2.

06 · Ecology & biofilm

Ecology & biofilm

How it lives on an electrode, who it partners with, and where it is found in nature.

Biofilm

  • Forms biofilm: yes
Biofilm thickness50 (20–80) µm
0100 µm

Biofilm conductivity

0.05 (0.005–5) S/m

Preferred electrode materials

  • graphite felt
  • carbon cloth
  • carbon brush
  • stainless steel mesh

Electron-exchange partners (3)

Frequently co-occurs with

  • Methanothrix harundinacea
  • Methanosarcina spp.
  • Pelobacter spp.

Conductive-mineral mediation

  • Mediates via conductive minerals: yes
  • Magnetite
  • Biochar

Magnetite stimulates DIET with methanogen partners; biochar similarly enhances syntrophic acetate/butyrate degradation (Liu 2015, Cruz Viggi 2014).

Ecosystems

  • Freshwater
  • Subsurface
  • Engineered MES

Isolation sources

  • subsurface sediment, Norman, Oklahoma USA

07 · Applications, engineering & safety

Applications, engineering & safety

Where it has been put to work, how tractable it is to engineer, and what handling it requires.

Applications (4)

  • Bioremediation metals · Pilot scale
    TRL 6/9
  • Wastewater treatment · Pilot scale
    TRL 5/9
  • Bioelectricity generation · Bench scale
    TRL 4/9
  • Research model organism · Lab pure culture

Engineering

Synthetic biology chassisIndustrial relevance 5/5

Reactor compatibility

  • MFC dual chamber
  • MEC
  • Sediment MFC
Scale demonstrated
Pilot

Engineering history (3)

  1. 1994 Wild type isolation

    Type strain isolated from Potomac River sediment.

    1994 · Caccavo F, et al. 1994

  2. 2009 Evolution

    Adaptive lab evolution under high-current selection (KN400 strain).

    Max current density 4 → 7.6 A/m2

    2009 · Yi H, et al. (2009). KN400 strain selection.DOI Spawned the geobacter_sulfurreducens_kn400 strain record (planned but not yet seeded).

  3. 2014 Engineered

    Markerless deletion of omcZ; abolishes high-current biofilm phenotype.

    2014 · Inoue K, et al. (2010); Liu Y, et al. (2014).DOI

Genetics

  • Genetically tractable: yes

Key EET genes

  • pilA
  • omcB
  • omcC
  • omcS
  • omcZ
  • omcE
  • ppcA
  • imcH
  • cbcL

qPCR targets

  • pilA
  • omcB
  • omcZ
  • omcS

Transformation methods

  • Electroporation
Available genetic tools
  • markerless deletion
  • pRG5 plasmid
  • pCM66 derivatives
  • CRISPR-Cas9

Omics studies (2)

  • Transcriptomics RNA seq anode biofilm · 2012DOI

    Anode-biofilm vs Fe(III) citrate transcriptome.

  • Proteomics Shotgun proteomics anode · 2012DOI

Operation

Stable operation2000 (500–5000) h
010,000 h
Fouling resistance
High
Load change sensitivity
Low
Recommended inoculation
Pre-grown anode biofilm transfer or planktonic seed at OD600 0.05–0.1 with acetate poising.
Pure vs mixed performance delta
1

Commercial

Strain itself is unencumbered; specific engineered variants may be IP-protected.

Biosafety

BSL-1
  • Pathogen: no

Modeling assets

  • Genome-scale metabolic model: yes
  • Kinetic model: yes
  • Biofilm model: yes
  • iAF987 (Feist et al. 2014)

Linked GEM: iAF987

08 · Sources & data quality

Sources & data quality

Every value above traces to a citation. This is how complete and how confident the record is.

Record quality

ComprehensiveHigh confidenceCurated: manual

Literature reviewed 2026-04-26 · schema v1.2.0 · updated 2026-05-14 · imported 2026-04-28

Per-field confidence

Engineering history
High
Genome metadata.size (bp)
High
Bibliometrics.total publications
Medium
EET mechanism.direct transfer.cytochromes
High
Electrochemical performance.max current density
High

References (5)

  1. Caccavo F, et al. (1994). Geobacter sulfurreducens sp. nov. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:3752-3759.PMID 7527204
  2. Bond DR, Lovley DR (2003). Electricity production by Geobacter sulfurreducens attached to electrodes. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1548-1555.doi:10.1128/AEM.69.3.1548-1555.2003
  3. Reguera G, et al. (2005). Extracellular electron transfer via microbial nanowires. Nature 435:1098-1101.doi:10.1038/nature03661
  4. Logan BE, et al. (2019). Electroactive microorganisms in BES. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:307-319.doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0173-x
  5. Wang F, et al. (2019). Structure of microbial nanowires reveals stacked hemes. Cell 177:361-369.

Bibliometrics

1500
Publications
2
Active research groups
1
Conflicts flagged
PILabCountry
Derek R. LovleyLovley LabUSA
Nikhil S. MalvankarMalvankar LabUSA
NotesTopicConflicting DOIs
Reguera 2005 reported PilA pili as nanowires; Wang 2019 demonstrated OmcS cytochrome filaments. Current consensus: OmcS/OmcZ filaments are the primary nanowires; PilA pilin is a secretion machine.Pilus vs cytochrome-filament identity of conductive nanowires10.1038/nature03661, 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.029
YearCitationDOI
2012Lovley DR (2012). Electromicrobiology. Annu Rev Microbiol 66:391-409.—
2019Logan BE, et al. (2019). Electroactive microorganisms in BES. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:307-319.10.1038/s41579-019-0173-x

Version history

  1. 2026-04-27 · v1.2.0 · messai_curation
    • Added structured cytochromes[] inventory with localization, heme counts, midpoint potentials.
    • Added genome_metadata, isolation provenance, type strain flag.
    • Added engineering_history (KN400 ALE; omcZ knockout).
    • Added bibliometrics, omics_resources, conductive mineral mediation.