MESSAI.io/Parameters
CatalogCorrelationsGlobal AnalysisParameter SweepMethodology
run 8f251904corpus v2026-05-19model gp-scm-v1.2.0ran 0.0s
SWEEPapplied_potentialfrom0.3to0.9across10 linear stepsat fixedT = 25°C, pH = 7, HRT = 168 h, area = 90 cm², culture = mixed_anaerobic
Viewpaper: marshall-2013-mesbacktest (all papers)
anti-HARKing rail · Logan & Regan 2006
Platform
Microbial electrochemical systems · living biofilm catalyst
System type
Sweep parameter
Fixed conditions
Objective
Reproducing

Marshall CW, Ross DE, Fichot EB, Norman RS, May HD (2013) — Environmental Science & Technology

Long-term operation of microbial electrosynthesis systems improves acetate production by autotrophic microbiomes
DOI: 10.1021/es400341b
MetricReportedPredictedΔBand
Coulombic efficiency
mean Faradaic efficiency to acetate across long-term steady-state operation, mixed autotrophic community, cathode poised at -590 mV vs SHE
p. 6025, §Results
84.0
%
84.0
%
0.0%green
Current density
steady-state cathodic current density at -590 mV vs SHE, mixed autotrophic biocathode; ~10× higher than the Nevin 2010 pure-culture baseline due to higher cathode biofilm coverage
p. 6025, Fig. 1 + text
0.50
A/m²
0.00
A/m²
-99.2%red
Δ-bands per Logan & Regan 2006 lab-to-lab reproducibility envelope: green ≤±25%, amber ±25–50%, red >±50%. Predictions from Butler-Volmer + Ohmic + Tafel closure calibrated against the Logan corpus (regression-tested in butler-volmer-calibration.test.ts).
What we don't know about this paper (5 items)
  1. BV MODEL CALIBRATION IS MFC-ONLY — same caveat as the Nevin 2010 preset. The backtest harness will produce red bands here because MES kinetics are not yet wired into `buildSweep`. Honest signal, not a regression.
  2. Acetate productivity (~17 mmol/L/day, the canonical headline number) is not in the standard backtest seriesKey set; we report Faradaic efficiency (`coulombic`) and current density (`current_areal`) which ARE in the schema. Extending the seriesKey set to include `acetate_productivity_mmol_L_day` is tracked as a future enhancement.
  3. Reported current density (~0.5 A/m²) is derived from the paper's steady-state current (~4-5 mA over ~90 cm² nominal cathode geometric area). The paper sometimes reports per-unit-mass rather than per-area; we use the geometric-area convention to align with the MFC presets.
  4. Mixed-community MES generally shows lower Faradaic efficiency than pure-culture S. ovata due to methanogen contamination; the 84% FE_acetate here is the paper's headline long-term-stable value AFTER initial methanogen washout. Short-term FE values are lower.
  5. Several biofilm and seeding details are paper-specific (brewery-pretreatment of the seed inoculum, multi-month enrichment) and cannot be portably reproduced in a fresh MES setup. Treat the headline numbers as the OPTIMIZED steady-state outcome, not the startup baseline.
Source mix
EMP 0CAL 0SIM 10EXT 0
Peak power density
0mW/m²✓ mass-bal
at x = 0.3 · n=0 nearby papers
Coulombic efficiency
84.0%
mixed-culture realistic range 20-55%
Internal resistance
0Ω·cm²
area-normalized; Logan-group standard
Empirical coverage
0.92@ 95%
n=52 · ECE 0.03 · small-n fold-back
SHOW
0.000.000.000.000.000.000.3000.4200.5400.6600.7800.900Power density (areal) (mW/m²)applied_potential (V)x=0.3 · Power density (areal)=0 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=0.37 · Power density (areal)=0 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=0.43 · Power density (areal)=0 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=0.5 · Power density (areal)=0 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=0.57 · Power density (areal)=0 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=0.63 · Power density (areal)=0 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=0.7 · Power density (areal)=0 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=0.77 · Power density (areal)=0 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=0.83 · Power density (areal)=0 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=0.9 · Power density (areal)=0 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papers◆ optimum0.0 mW/m² @ 0.3