MESSAI.io/Parameters
CatalogCorrelationsGlobal AnalysisParameter SweepMethodology
run a66a1f58corpus v2026-05-19model gp-scm-v1.2.0ran 0.0s
SWEEPelectrode_area_cm2from10to1000across10 log stepsat fixedT = 23°C, pH = 7, HRT = 24 h, area = 200 cm², culture = wastewater_inoculum
Viewpaper: logan-2008-scaleupbacktest (all papers)
anti-HARKing rail · Logan & Regan 2006
WARNV5Coulombic mass-balance is open on 10/10 sweep points (>5% closure error). Check substrate consumption + Q_measured.· Logan-group hygiene check; mass balance fundamentals
Platform
Microbial electrochemical systems · living biofilm catalyst
System type
Sweep parameter
Fixed conditions
Objective
Reproducing

Logan BE (2008) — Wiley

Microbial Fuel Cells (Wiley, 2008) — Ch. 4 architecture & Ch. 6 wastewater scale-up
DOI: ISBN 978-0-470-23948-3
MetricReportedPredictedΔBand
Power density
pilot-scale (200 cm² projected area), domestic wastewater, air-cathode, no PEM — arithmetic midpoint of Logan 2008 Ch. 6 narrative range (50-150 mW/m²)
Ch. 6 §6.2
100
mW/m²
129
mW/m²
+28.9%amber
Coulombic efficiency
wastewater + air-cathode at pilot scale — O₂ crossover and flow non-uniformity depress CE below the bench-scale 12% Liu-Logan number; textbook narrative pegs pilot CE around 8-12%
Ch. 6 §6.3
10.0
%
10.6
%
+6.0%green
COD removal
COD removal across an fed-batch / continuous cycle at pilot scale
Ch. 6 §6.3
75.0
%
80.0
%
+6.7%green
Δ-bands per Logan & Regan 2006 lab-to-lab reproducibility envelope: green ≤±25%, amber ±25–50%, red >±50%. Predictions from Butler-Volmer + Ohmic + Tafel closure calibrated against the Logan corpus (regression-tested in butler-volmer-calibration.test.ts).
What we don't know about this paper (5 items)
  1. TEXTBOOK CONSENSUS, NOT A SINGLE PAPER. The 50-150 mW/m² range is Logan's narrative across multiple wastewater scale-up papers (Liu et al. 2004, He et al. 2005, Aelterman et al. 2006, Logan-group 2007-2008 pilot runs). The "80 mW/m² midpoint" is a representative number, not a measured value from one experiment.
  2. The "scale-up penalty" is not a universal physical law — it depends on cathode design (stacked cathodes can recover some of the loss), flow distribution (advective mixing helps), and inoculum maturity. Modern brush-anode + stacked-cathode pilots (post-2010, not in this textbook) reach 200-400 mW/m² at 1000+ cm² scale.
  3. CE = 8% at pilot scale reflects O₂ crossover dominance at long HRT — by Logan 2008's own reporting CE recovers to 15-25% with continuous-flow + reduced HRT.
  4. Sweep axis here is `electrode_area_cm2` (not external_resistance) because the textbook consensus IS the area-dependence curve. The 200 cm² fixed value sits at the midpoint of the swept range so the predicted peak corresponds to the reported 80 mW/m².
  5. BV calibration confidence is LOWER for this preset than for single-paper presets. The textbook itself notes "scale-up data is sparser than bench-scale" — expect ±40-50% delta bands rather than the ±25% Logan-Regan envelope.
Source mix
EMP 0CAL 0SIM 10EXT 0
Peak power density
129mW/m²✓ mass-bal
at x = 10 · n=0 nearby papers
Coulombic efficiency
10.6%
mixed-culture realistic range 20-55%
Internal resistance
5607Ω·cm²
area-normalized; Logan-group standard
Empirical coverage
0.97@ 95%
n=325 · ECE 0.02
SHOW
12912912912912912910.0208.0406.0604.0802.01000Power density (areal) (mW/m²)electrode_area_cm2 (-)x=10 · Power density (areal)=128.9 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=16.7 · Power density (areal)=128.9 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=27.8 · Power density (areal)=128.9 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=46.4 · Power density (areal)=128.9 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=77.4 · Power density (areal)=128.9 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=129 · Power density (areal)=128.9 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=215 · Power density (areal)=128.9 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=359 · Power density (areal)=128.9 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=599 · Power density (areal)=128.9 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=1000 · Power density (areal)=128.9 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papers◆ optimum128.9 mW/m² @ 10