MESSAI.io/Parameters
CatalogCorrelationsGlobal AnalysisParameter SweepMethodology
run 3fe9a9b4corpus v2026-05-19model gp-scm-v1.2.0ran 0.0s
SWEEPexternal_resistancefrom10to10000across12 log stepsat fixedT = 25°C, pH = 7, HRT = 24 h, area = 25 cm², culture = wastewater_inoculum
Viewpaper: c-vulgaris-2019-mdc-algaebacktest (all papers)
anti-HARKing rail · Logan & Regan 2006
WARNV5Coulombic mass-balance is open on 10/12 sweep points (>5% closure error). Check substrate consumption + Q_measured.· Logan-group hygiene check; mass balance fundamentals
Platform
Microbial electrochemical systems · living biofilm catalyst
System type
Sweep parameter
Fixed conditions
Objective
Reproducing

Liu et al. (2019) — Water Reuse and Desalination

Using C. vulgaris assisted microbial desalination cell as a green technology in landfill leachate pre-treatment: a factor-performance relation study
DOI: 10.2166/wrd.2019.073
MetricReportedPredictedΔBand
Power density
3-chamber photosynthetic MDC with C. vulgaris algae biocathode treating real landfill leachate, mid-range factor-conditions (FC) for external resistance / pumping rate / temperature / light / DO. Headline number from abstract: "maximum power density of 121.57 mW m⁻² (anodic volume)". Anchors the algae-sub-regime power ceiling — pairs with Salgado-Hernández 2021 current_areal anchor (1.2 A/m²) on the same Rint / CE / OCV branch parameters.
DB extraction (paperId cmcva3cxr00xvrc9dq8kpjue0, confidence 0.5): maxPowerDensity = 121.57 mW/m². Abstract phrasing: "a maximum power density of 121.57 mWm−2 (anodic volume) and an average desalination rate of 3.93 mg/L/h".
122
mW/m²
154
mW/m²
+26.3%amber
Δ-bands per Logan & Regan 2006 lab-to-lab reproducibility envelope: green ≤±25%, amber ±25–50%, red >±50%. Predictions from Butler-Volmer + Ohmic + Tafel closure calibrated against the Logan corpus (regression-tested in butler-volmer-calibration.test.ts).
What we don't know about this paper (4 items)
  1. Wave 1.5 calibration preset (2026-05-22, codex P1) — added as the 2nd algae-sub-regime anchor after the Salgado-Hernández anchor was corrected from 0.12 → 1.2 A/m² (mA/cm² unit-conversion fix). Source: local Supabase DB query (paperId cmcva3cxr00xvrc9dq8kpjue0, confidence 0.5 on maxPowerDensity).
  2. Confidence 0.5 on the power_density extraction. Abstract clearly states "121.57 mWm⁻² (anodic volume)" but the closure-relevant config details (exact COD, HRT, electrode area, salinity) are NOT pinned in the abstract — we pick bench MDC defaults matched to the Salgado sister-anchor. The algae sub-regime is current-limited by photosynthetic O₂ supply at the cathode, so the anode-side defaults are not the dominant fit lever.
  3. Anchor on `power_areal`, not `current_areal` or `coulombic`. Abstract does not cleanly report a peak current density or system CE. The branch model predicts both current AND power from the same underlying Rint/CE/OCV parameters, so a power-only anchor still constrains the branch — pairs with Salgado-Hernández current_areal / CE anchors on the same branch.
  4. Landfill leachate is a real, complex anolyte (NOT defined medium). The closure label `culture_type: wastewater_inoculum` is the closest match; landfill-leachate-specific anode kinetics (heavy metals + recalcitrant organics) are NOT modeled — the algae cathode is the dominant lever for this anchor.
Source mix
EMP 0CAL 0SIM 12EXT 0
Peak power density
149mW/m²✗ mass-bal
at x = 231 · n=0 nearby papers
Coulombic efficiency
4.1%
mixed-culture realistic range 20-55%
Internal resistance
3220Ω·cm²
area-normalized; Logan-group standard
Empirical coverage
0.92@ 95%
n=52 · ECE 0.03 · small-n fold-back
SHOW
-459.12-324.07-189.02-53.9781.0821610.0200840066004800210000Power density (areal) (mW/m²)external_resistance (Ω)x=10 · Power density (areal)=-414.1 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=18.7 · Power density (areal)=-320.3 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=35.1 · Power density (areal)=-188.5 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=65.8 · Power density (areal)=-37.7 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=123 · Power density (areal)=87.9 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=231 · Power density (areal)=148.6 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=433 · Power density (areal)=146.1 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=811 · Power density (areal)=112.3 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=1520 · Power density (areal)=75.3 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=2850 · Power density (areal)=46.7 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=5340 · Power density (areal)=27.8 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papersx=10000 · Power density (areal)=16.1 mW/m² · SIMULATED · 0 nearby papers◆ optimum148.6 mW/m² @ 231