Forschungsdaten – Titel und Zusammenfassungen von Publikationen, extrahierte Daten und Katalogeinträge – erscheinen in ihrer Originalsprache Englisch.
A laboratory-scale study of the applicability of a halophilic sediment bioelectrochemical system for in situ reclamation of water and sediment in brackish aquaculture ponds: establishment, bacterial community and performance evaluation.
H. Pham, Hien Tran, Linh Vu, H. T. Dang +5
KI-Zusammenfassung
72 % KonfidenzThis study established a sediment bioelectrochemical system (SBES) integrated into a laboratory-scale brackish aquaculture pond model to treat uneaten feed and nitrogen pollution. Over one year, the SBES removed 20–30% more COD from water than control, reduced sediment mass by 40%, and removed ~52% more total nitrogen from sediment. Negligible nitrate and nitrite accumulation was observed. The anode enriched halophilic bacteria including Methylophilus rhizosphaerae, Desulfatitalea tepidiphila, and Thiothrix eikelboomii at steady-state current density of 2.3 mA/m² and power density of 0.05 mW/m².
Zentrale Erkenntnisse
Mechanismus Nitrogen removal from sediment (52% more than control) was driven primarily by sediment mass reduction (40%) rather than concentration change, indicating the SBES mineralizes or exports organic nitrogen-rich solids rather than converting them to soluble forms.
Was heißt das. Operators should monitor sediment accumulation rate and composition, not just water-phase ammonia or nitrate, to assess nitrogen removal efficacy in brackish SBES.
Mechanismus Negligible NO₃⁻ and NO₂⁻ accumulation (Table S1) despite 52% nitrogen removal suggests complete denitrification to N₂ or N₂O, or incorporation into biomass, rather than partial nitrification.
Was heißt das. Measure N₂O and N₂ production to confirm complete denitrification pathway and assess greenhouse gas risk; do not assume all removed nitrogen is benign.
Zielkonflikt COD removal advantage of SBES over control increased from 20% to 30% when feed load doubled (0.051 to 0.11 g/d), indicating the system's relative benefit scales with organic loading.
Was heißt das. Design SBES for high-load aquaculture scenarios (60-day-old shrimp, 1.08 mg/l TN/d) where the electrochemical advantage is most pronounced; low-load systems may not justify electrode cost.
Methode Steady-state current density (2.3 mA/m²) and power density (0.05 mW/m²) were achieved after ~3 weeks of enrichment, but the paper does not report anode or cathode potential, making it impossible to infer electrochemical driving force or assess whether the system operated under diffusion or kinetic limitation.
Was heißt das. Measure and report anode and cathode potentials (vs. Ag/AgCl or SHE) to enable comparison with other SBES studies and to diagnose whether performance is limited by electron transfer kinetics, oxygen reduction, or mass transport.
Mechanismus Halophilic bacteria (Methylophilus rhizosphaerae, Desulfatitalea tepidiphila, Thiothrix eikelboomii) dominated the SBES anode but are not previously reported in bioelectrochemical systems, suggesting salinity selects for a distinct electroactive consortium compared to freshwater systems.
Was heißt das. Characterize the electrochemical activity and substrate preferences of these halophilic isolates; they may enable SBES design for marine and brackish environments where freshwater consortia fail.
Ansatzpunkte6
Konkrete Lücken in dieser Publikation, jeweils mit einem Experiment, das sie schließen würde.
Hoch Anode and cathode potentials (vs. Ag/AgCl or SHE) were not measured or reported, preventing diagnosis of electrochemical bottlenecks and comparison with other SBES studies.
Current density (2.3 mA/m²) and power density (0.05 mW/m²) are reported, but without voltage data, the electrochemical driving force and efficiency cannot be assessed. The paper states 'Electrical parameters (current I(A), voltage U(V), power P(W) and resistance R(W)) were measured and/or calculated' but only current and power are presented.
Versuch. Measure and report anode potential (vs. Ag/AgCl), cathode potential, and cell voltage throughout enrichment and steady state; correlate with current density to identify kinetic vs. mass-transport limitations.
Hoch N₂O and N₂ production were not quantified, leaving the nitrogen removal pathway (complete denitrification vs. partial nitrification vs. biomass incorporation) unconfirmed.
Nitrate and nitrite are reported as 'negligible' but no quantitative threshold is given. The paper states 'Insignificant amounts of nitrite and nitrate were detected, suggesting a complete removal of nitrogen by the system' but does not measure gaseous products. For a brackish aquaculture system, N₂O emissions are a regulatory and environmental concern.
Versuch. Measure N₂O and N₂ in headspace or dissolved phase using gas chromatography or membrane inlet mass spectrometry; quantify nitrogen balance (input vs. output as NO₃⁻, NO₂⁻, N₂O, N₂, biomass).
Mittel Cathode dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration and oxygen reduction kinetics were not characterized, despite the cathode being the final electron acceptor and potentially rate-limiting.
The paper states the cathode is 'floating on the water surface, i.e. the cathode was in contact 50% with the water and 50% with the air (to allow oxygen from air to diffuse in and accept electrons)' but does not measure DO at the cathode or quantify oxygen mass transfer. At 2.3 mA/m² current density, oxygen consumption is low, but the paper does not verify this assumption.
Versuch. Measure DO concentration in the cathode chamber and bulk water; calculate oxygen consumption rate from current; vary cathode submersion depth or aeration to test whether oxygen transfer is limiting.
Mittel Catholyte pH was not reported or controlled, yet pH strongly affects oxygen reduction kinetics and nitrification/denitrification pathways in bioelectrochemical systems.
The paper uses artificial brackish water (15% salinity) but does not report initial or steady-state pH. Nitrogen speciation (NH₄⁺ vs. NH₃, NO₃⁻ vs. HNO₃) and oxygen reduction rate depend on pH. The paper does not discuss pH control or drift.
Versuch. Monitor and report pH in cathode and anode chambers throughout the experiment; test pH range 6.5–8.5 to assess impact on current density, nitrogen removal, and N₂O production.
Mittel Hydraulic retention time (HRT) and water exchange rate were not defined, making it unclear whether the system operated as a batch, semi-continuous, or continuous reactor.
The paper states tanks were 'fed with shrimp feed' daily but does not specify water exchange, overflow, or sampling protocol. The 6 L tank with daily feed addition suggests semi-continuous operation, but HRT is not calculated. This affects interpretation of removal rates and comparison with other studies.
Versuch. Define and report HRT; conduct a tracer study (e.g., bromide or fluorescein) to measure actual water residence time; report removal rates normalized to HRT (e.g., mg COD removed per liter per day).
Mittel Anode potential was not controlled; the system operated under open-circuit or fixed external resistance (10 Ω), which may not be optimal for nitrogen removal or may have drifted during the year-long experiment.
The paper states 'The graphite rods of the anode and the cathode were connected with copper wire to an external resistor of 10 Ω' but does not justify this choice or report whether potential was stable. Potentiostatic control at a fixed anode potential (e.g., −0.3 V vs. SHE) would enable reproducibility and optimization for denitrification.
Versuch. Operate the SBES under potentiostatic control at anode potentials ranging from −0.5 to 0 V vs. Ag/AgCl; measure current density, nitrogen removal, and N₂O production at each potential to identify the optimal window for complete denitrification.
Erstellt von der MESSAI-Extraktionspipeline · mit dem Quell-PDF abgleichen
Was gemacht wurde
- Systemtyp
- MFC
Was funktioniert hat
Noch keine Ergebniskennzahlen extrahiert.
Zusammenfassung
In this study, we investigated the potential of using sediment bioelectrochemical systems (SBESs) for in-situ treatment of the water and the sediment of brackish aquaculture ponds polluted with uneaten feed. A SBES integrated into a laboratory-scale tank simulating a brackish aquaculture pond was established. Such a tank (test tank) and the control (not containing the SBES) were fed with shrimp feed in a scheme that mimics a situation where 50% of feed is uneaten. After the SBES was inoculated with microbial sources from actual shrimp pond sediments, electricity generation was well observed from the first experimental week, indicating a successful enrichment of electrochemically active bacteria at the sediment of the test tank. The electricity generation became steady after 3 weeks of operation, with an average current density of 2.3 mA m⁻² anode surface and an average power density of 0.05 mW m⁻² anode surface. At the steady state, the SBES removed 20-30% more COD of the tank water, compared to the control. After 1 year, the SBES also reduced the amount of the sediment in the tank by 40% and thus could remove approximately 40% more COD and approximately 52% more nitrogen of the sediment, compared to the control. Insignificant amount of nitrite and nitrate was detected, suggesting a complete removal of nitrogen by the system. PCR-DGGE-based analyses revealed the dominant presence of Methylophilus rhizosphaerae, Desulfatitalea tepidiphila and Thiothrix eikelboomii, which have not been found in bioelectrochemical systems before, in the bacterial community in the sediment of the SBES-containing tank. This community was significantly distinct from those of the inoculum and the control tank, which were more related to each other. The results of this research demonstrate the potential application of SBESs for in-situ water and sediment reclamation of brackish aquaculture systems, which will certainly help reduce water pollution threats, fish and shrimp disease risks and thus farmers' losses.
Schlagwörter
Kennungen
- Zeitschrift
- Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
- Jahr
- 2019
Repräsentatives Modell: MFC – zugeordnet nur anhand des Systemtyps der Publikation, nicht ihres Reaktors oder ihrer Geometrie.
Öffnen Sie das Modell im Labor, um alle Steuerelemente, die Parameterbearbeitung und Vorlagen-Overlays zu nutzen.
Im Labor öffnen →