Forschungsdaten – Titel und Zusammenfassungen von Publikationen, extrahierte Daten und Katalogeinträge – erscheinen in ihrer Originalsprache Englisch.

KI-Zusammenfassung

72 % Konfidenz

This thesis investigates bioelectrochemical and electrochemical systems (BES/ES) for recovering total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) from urine as an alternative to conventional nitrification/denitrification or Haber-Bosch synthesis. The work introduces the 'load ratio' concept—the relationship between applied current density and TAN loading rate—as a key operating parameter. In electrochemical systems with integrated gas-permeable membranes, load ratios of 1.2–1.3 achieved 73–82% TAN removal and 60–73% recovery. However, BES systems achieved only 2–47% removal (with rare exceptions of 52–61%) because current densities were insufficient to transport all TAN across the cation exchange membrane, with load ratios never exceeding 0.8.

Zentrale Erkenntnisse

  • Schwellenwert Load ratio (current density relative to TAN loading rate) of 1.2–1.3 in electrochemical systems yields 73–82% TAN removal efficiency and 60–73% recovery, but BES systems could not exceed load ratio 0.8, resulting in only 2–47% removal.

    Was heißt das. Operators must maintain load ratio ≥1.2 by either increasing current density or decreasing TAN loading; in BES, this requires either higher organic loading (to boost current) or lower HRT, creating a trade-off with other performance metrics.

  • Mechanismus Hydrogen-recycling electrochemical systems (HRES) reduce energy demand to 4–9% of total by recycling cathode-produced H₂ as anode electron donor, compared to conventional ES that oxidize water.

    Was heißt das. For TAN recovery from low-organic wastewaters (e.g., reject water), couple ES with on-site H₂ recycling rather than external power; this reduces energy penalty and chloride oxidation risk.

  • Mechanismus BES current density is limited by organic matter oxidation rate and cannot be independently controlled like ES, making it difficult to achieve the load ratio window needed for efficient TAN transport.

    Was heißt das. For BES-based TAN recovery, prioritize systems with high organic loading (e.g., digestate, manure) or couple to external H₂ supply; do not rely on current control alone.

  • Mechanismus Coupling (B)ES to gas-permeable hydrophobic membranes with in-situ pH rise at cathode eliminates need for external caustic addition, reducing chemical costs compared to stripping or struvite precipitation.

    Was heißt das. Design integrated (B)ES + membrane units to avoid separate caustic dosing; this improves economics and reduces operational complexity.

  • Zielkonflikt Hydrogen recycling in HRES lowers chloride oxidation risk (formation of Cl₂, chlorination byproducts, AOX) compared to water-oxidizing ES, important for high-chloride streams like urine.

    Was heißt das. For chloride-rich wastewaters (urine, reject water), prefer HRES or BES over conventional ES to avoid disinfection byproduct formation and regulatory compliance issues.

Widersprüche1

Nur Konflikte, die die Publikation selbst zeigt, jeweils am Text geprüft.

  • Innerhalb der Publikation BES current density is both a limiting factor and an uncontrollable variable, yet the paper proposes load ratio as a design parameter.

    Eine Seite

    'In a BES the current density cannot be controlled as easily as in an electrochemical system, because it depends on the oxidation of organic matter by microorganisms.'

    “In a BES the current density cannot be controlled as easily as in an electrochemical system, because it depends on the oxidation of organic matter by microorganisms.”
    Andere Seite

    'The load ratio can be manipulated either by changing the current density or the TAN loading rate.' and 'The load ratio is useful to find the conditions in which a (B)ES for the recovery of TAN can be operated optimally'

    “The load ratio can be manipulated either by changing the current density or the TAN loading rate.”

    Einordnung der Autoren. The authors acknowledge that in BES, current is not directly controllable, so load ratio can only be manipulated via TAN loading (HRT, dilution, or pre-removal). This is a design constraint, not a contradiction, but it limits the practical utility of load ratio as a control variable in BES.

Ansatzpunkte6

Konkrete Lücken in dieser Publikation, jeweils mit einem Experiment, das sie schließen würde.

  • Hoch No systematic study of cathode potential (vs. NHE or Ag/AgCl) and its effect on TAN transport rate, NH₃ vs. NH₄⁺ speciation at cathode, or competing H⁺ reduction (hydrogen evolution).

    Paper discusses pH rise at cathode and NH₃ formation but does not report actual cathode potentials or measure H₂ evolution rate; this is critical for understanding TAN vs. H₂ competition and optimizing cathode design.

    Versuch. Vary cathode potential from −0.6 to −0.2 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) in ES with urine; measure TAN flux, H₂ production rate, and final pH; determine optimal window for TAN recovery without excessive H₂ evolution.

  • Hoch No investigation of anode potential and its effect on current density, organic oxidation rate, or electrode fouling in BES.

    Chapter 6 identifies low current density as the main limitation in BES but does not explore anode potential control or biofilm optimization; this is a key lever for improving BES performance.

    Versuch. Measure anode potential (vs. Ag/AgCl) during BES operation on synthetic urine at different organic loadings; correlate with current density and biofilm composition; test anode potential control (e.g., poised anode) to maximize current.

  • Hoch No measurement of N₂O or NO₂⁻ accumulation in either ES or BES, despite nitrification/denitrification being a known pathway in bioelectrochemical systems.

    Paper focuses on TAN recovery but does not rule out or quantify side reactions (e.g., partial denitrification to N₂O at cathode, or nitrification in anode biofilm). This is critical for environmental and safety assessment.

    Versuch. Measure N₂O, NO₂⁻, NO₃⁻ in gas and liquid phases during BES and ES operation; use ¹⁵N-labeled NH₄⁺ to trace nitrogen fate; determine if cathode pH rise suppresses or promotes N₂O formation.

  • Mittel No systematic variation of catholyte pH and its effect on TAN transport, NH₃ volatilization, or H₂ evolution; pH is mentioned as a factor but not experimentally isolated.

    Paper states that pH >9.25 favors NH₃ over NH₄⁺ and that cathode reactions produce OH⁻, but does not report final pH or test pH control strategies; this affects both recovery efficiency and product form.

    Versuch. Operate ES with pH control (buffer or acid/base dosing) at cathode; vary final pH from 8 to 11; measure TAN speciation, volatilization loss, and H₂ evolution; determine optimal pH for TAN recovery without excessive NH₃ loss.

  • Mittel No comparison of cation exchange membrane (CEM) performance (selectivity, fouling, resistance) across different membrane types or operating conditions (current density, pH, ionic strength).

    Paper uses CEM but does not report membrane resistance, selectivity for NH₄⁺ vs. Na⁺/K⁺, or fouling mechanisms; membrane is a key cost and performance driver.

    Versuch. Test 2–3 commercial CEM types in ES at load ratios 0.5–1.5; measure voltage drop across membrane, ion selectivity (NH₄⁺ vs. Na⁺), and resistance change over time; correlate with TAN recovery and energy input.

  • Mittel No exploration of HRT (hydraulic retention time) as an independent variable in BES; HRT is varied indirectly via dilution and flow rate but not systematically studied.

    Chapter 5 varies dilution and flow rate to manipulate load ratio, but does not isolate HRT effect on biofilm activity, current density, or TAN removal; this is needed to optimize reactor design.

    Versuch. Fix organic and TAN loading rates; vary HRT from 2 to 24 hours in BES; measure current density, TAN removal, and biofilm composition; determine minimum HRT for stable operation and maximum current.

Erstellt von der MESSAI-Extraktionspipeline · mit dem Quell-PDF abgleichen

Zusammenfassung

Nitrogen removal from wastewaters is necessary to prevent the pollution of receiving water bodies. At the same time, nitrogen is an essential nutrient for plants, so it is used in the production of fertilizers. Both the conventional removal of nitrogen compounds from wastewater and their production are energy intensive. For this reason, recovering nitrogen directly from wastewater, instead of removing it, can result in reduced energy consumption associated with both its production and removal processes. The use of electrochemical systems (ES) and bioelectrochemical systems (BES) for the recovery of ammonia from wastewaters has been investigated over the past few years. These systems have been proposed as a sustainable alternative to conventional processes because they have the potential to recover energy (in the form of electricity or H2) from wastewaters while recovering ammonia. From all the domestic wastewater streams, urine contains most of the nitrogen (around 80%), and represents only 1% of the volume. Urine can be collected by the use of urine-diverting toilets or waterless urinals, preventing the dilution of the nutrients with high volumes of potable water. In this thesis, we evaluated the use of (bio)electrochemical systems for the recovery of total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) from urine. Our focus was on improving the understanding and performance of the system in terms of TAN recovery. This was needed to get the technology closer to application as, at the start of this research, the proof-of-principle had just been demonstrated, and the highest TAN recoveries were around 30%. The feasibility of BES as a technology for energy-efficient TAN recovery was evaluated in Chapter 2. It was shown that BESs can become economically feasible if, on top of electricity or hydrogen production, the benefits of TAN removal are taken into account. According to our analysis, when TAN removal is taken into account, BESs can still be economic at high internal resistances (200 mΩ.m²), which makes it easier for the application of the system at a bigger scale. The need to develop and test a method to effectively extract ammonia from the catholyte solution was identified as one of the main limiting factors of the system. One of the main conclusions from Chapter 2 was that it was crucial to couple an effective TAN stripping system to the BES to increase TAN recovery. This was addressed in Chapter 3, and followed up in Chapters 4 and 5. Finally, it was determined that to improve TAN recovery in BES, the interactions between the factors affecting the recovery of TAN in BES (such as current density, catholyte pH, TAN concentration, etc.) should be studied in more detail. In Chapter 3, we demonstrated that an ES with an integrated gas-permeable hydrophobic membrane unit can effectively recover TAN from urine. Furthermore, the relationship between current density and TAN loading rate was studied in more detail. It was shown that the relationship between the applied current density and the TAN loading, here called the load ratio, is essential to assess the TAN removal efficiency and energy input of (B)ESs. The load ratio is useful to find the conditions in which a (B)ES for the recovery of TAN can be operated optimally, but it does not take into account other parameters essential to assess the performance of (B)ESs. These limitations are discussed throughout the thesis and in Chapter 6. In Chapter 4, a hydrogen-recycling electrochemical system (HRES) was developed to minimize the energy input of electrochemical systems for the recovery of TAN. In this technology, the hydrogen gas produced at the cathode is reused as the electron donor in the anode, allowing for ammonia recovery at high rates and relatively low energy input. This technology can be applied to recover TAN from wastewaters that do not contain enough organic matter to be treated in a BES. Furthermore, it lowers the risk of chloride oxidation, which typically occurs in electrochemical systems treating wastewaters with high concentrations of chloride, such as urine. Chloride oxidation can result in the formation of harmful compounds such as chlorine gas, chlorination byproducts and adsorbable organic halides (AOX). At a load ratio of 1.2-1.3, the system accomplished TAN removal efficiencies of 73-82% and recoveries of 60-73%. Additional hydrogen needed to be supplied by a supporting electrolyzer, which accounted for 4-9% of the total energy demand of the system. Finally, in Chapter 5, we tested the concept of load ratio in a BES. The load ratio can be manipulated either by changing the current density or the TAN loading rate. In a BES the current density cannot be controlled as easily as in an electrochemical system, because it depends on the oxidation of organic matter by microorganisms. At the same time, manipulating the TAN loading rate would directly affect the organic loading rate, and therefore the current density. We ran the BES coupled to a gas-permeable hydrophobic membrane on synthetic urine and urine. Both influents were fed at different dilutions, flow rates and certain modifications (such as removing TAN from urine prior to feeding it to the cell) in order to obtain a variety of load ratios. We found out that there was a clear increasing trend in TAN removal efficiency with respect to load ratio for both human and synthetic urine. We did not obtain load ratios higher than 0.8, which means that the current was not enough to transport all the TAN across the membrane. This resulted in overall low removal efficiencies (2 to 47%, with 3 exceptions from 52- 61%). In Chapter 6, we discuss what may cause these low current densities. In this last chapter, we also focus on the reasons why (B)ESs have not been applied at larger scales yet, and give future perspectives and recommendations to bring this promising technology closer to application.

Schlagwörter

WastewaterAmmoniaResource recoveryPulp and paper industryWaste managementNitrogen

Kennungen

Zeitschrift
Unbekannte Zeitschrift
Jahr
2019
Extraktion

Berichtete Parameter

Dieser Publikation ist noch kein 3D-Modell zugeordnet. Die Parameterbereiche oben ordnen die berichteten Werte trotzdem in die Literaturverteilung ein.